Core i7-9700K vs Core Ultra 5 225

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Core Ultra 5 225

10 Cores10 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2025

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 31,137).
    • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
    • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
    • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

    Core Ultra 5 225

    2025

    Why buy it

    • Better for gaming: +56.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • +66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
    • Costs $145 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
    • Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
    • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

    Trade-offs

    • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core Ultra 5 225 better than Core i7-9700K?
    Yes. Core Ultra 5 225 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 56.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 116.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core Ultra 5 225 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 56.4% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core Ultra 5 225 is the better fit. You are getting 116.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 10 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core Ultra 5 225 is the smarter buy today. Core Ultra 5 225 is $145 cheaper on MSRP at $240 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 56.4% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 246.9% better value on MSRP (129.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core Ultra 5 225 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with LGA1851 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 10 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

    Games Benchmarks

    Paired with RTX 4090

    To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

    Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

    Path of Exile 2

    Path of Exile 2

    PresetCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    1080p
    low308 FPS256 FPS
    medium278 FPS244 FPS
    high231 FPS208 FPS
    ultra182 FPS176 FPS
    1440p
    low270 FPS219 FPS
    medium221 FPS187 FPS
    high178 FPS154 FPS
    ultra143 FPS133 FPS
    4K
    low170 FPS150 FPS
    medium140 FPS127 FPS
    high108 FPS99 FPS
    ultra95 FPS86 FPS
    Counter-Strike 2

    Counter-Strike 2

    PresetCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    1080p
    low360 FPS603 FPS
    medium321 FPS512 FPS
    high291 FPS421 FPS
    ultra259 FPS378 FPS
    1440p
    low324 FPS501 FPS
    medium282 FPS441 FPS
    high258 FPS372 FPS
    ultra225 FPS319 FPS
    4K
    low249 FPS301 FPS
    medium221 FPS266 FPS
    high208 FPS248 FPS
    ultra179 FPS218 FPS
    League of Legends

    League of Legends

    PresetCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    1080p
    low360 FPS778 FPS
    medium360 FPS680 FPS
    high360 FPS609 FPS
    ultra360 FPS522 FPS
    1440p
    low360 FPS725 FPS
    medium360 FPS588 FPS
    high360 FPS515 FPS
    ultra360 FPS439 FPS
    4K
    low360 FPS504 FPS
    medium360 FPS422 FPS
    high360 FPS377 FPS
    ultra318 FPS318 FPS
    Valorant

    Valorant

    PresetCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    1080p
    low360 FPS778 FPS
    medium360 FPS778 FPS
    high360 FPS777 FPS
    ultra360 FPS699 FPS
    1440p
    low360 FPS778 FPS
    medium360 FPS716 FPS
    high360 FPS623 FPS
    ultra360 FPS547 FPS
    4K
    low360 FPS560 FPS
    medium360 FPS510 FPS
    high360 FPS457 FPS
    ultra360 FPS402 FPS

    Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core Ultra 5 225

    Intel

    Core i7-9700K

    The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

    Intel

    Core Ultra 5 225

    The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core Ultra 5 225's 31,137 — a 73.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 8
    10 / 10+25%
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz
    4.9 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz+9%
    3.3 GHz
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)
    20 MB (total)+67%
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    3 MB (per core)+1100%
    Process
    14 nm
    3 nm-79%
    Architecture
    Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
    Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025)
    PassMark
    14,397
    31,137+116%
    Cinebench R23 Multi
    17,020
    Geekbench 6 Single
    2,653
    Geekbench 6 Multi
    13,028
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) — the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225).

    FeatureCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    Socket
    LGA1151
    LGA1851
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 5.0+67%
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2666
    DDR5-6400+25%
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    256 GB+100%
    RAM Channels
    2
    2
    ECC Support
    No
    No
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    24+50%
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    Yes
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 630
    Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores)
    Unlocked
    Yes
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    VT-x, VT-d, EPT
    Target Use
    Desktop
    Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency
    💰

    Value Analysis

    The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225 debuted at $240. On MSRP ($385 vs $240), the Core Ultra 5 225 is $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 129.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225 — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 110.5% better value option.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KCore Ultra 5 225
    MSRP
    $385
    $240-38%
    Performance per Dollar
    37.4
    129.7+247%
    Release Date
    2018
    2025