
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 5 225
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 31,137).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core Ultra 5 225
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.4% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Costs $145 less on MSRP ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 246.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 129.7 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($240 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 5 225 across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 31,137).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 129.7 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $240 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 5 225 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 256 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 219 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 603 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 378 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 501 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 441 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 372 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 218 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 680 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 725 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 588 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 515 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 439 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 318 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 777 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 699 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 778 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 716 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 623 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 547 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 402 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core Ultra 5 225

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core Ultra 5 225
Core Ultra 5 225
The Core Ultra 5 225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 7 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) architecture. It features 10 cores and 10 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 31,137 points. Launch price was $246.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 10 cores / 10 threads — the Core Ultra 5 225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.9 GHz on the Core Ultra 5 225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core Ultra 5 225's 31,137 — a 73.5% lead for the Core Ultra 5 225. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 5 225.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 10 / 10+25% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 4.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 3 MB (per core)+1100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Arrow Lake-S (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 31,137+116% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,020 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,653 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,028 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 5 225 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 5 225 — the Core Ultra 5 225 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 5 225 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 5 225) — the Core Ultra 5 225 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Z890,B860,H810 (Core Ultra 5 225).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 5 225). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 5 225) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 5 225 targets Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 5 225 rivals Ryzen 5 8600G.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Arc Graphics (2 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mainstream Desktop / Efficiency |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Core Ultra 5 225 debuted at $240. On MSRP ($385 vs $240), the Core Ultra 5 225 is $145 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 129.7 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 5 225 — making the Core Ultra 5 225 the 110.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 5 225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $240-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 129.7+247% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












