
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Core Ultra 7 155H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,705).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-9700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Core Ultra 7 155H
2023Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +49.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (24 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA2049 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Laptop Integrated), unlike Core i7-9700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 7 155H across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,705).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 24 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Core Ultra 7 155H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Core Ultra 7 155H moves to FCBGA2049 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 7 155H better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 278 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 232 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 93 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 389 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 550 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 543 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 531 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 402 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 538 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 486 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Core Ultra 7 155H

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core Ultra 7 155H
Core Ultra 7 155H
The Core Ultra 7 155H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 December 2023 (1 year ago). It is based on the Meteor Lake-H (2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 22 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.8 GHz. L3 cache: 24 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2049. Thermal design power (TDP): + 24 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,705 points. Launch price was $503.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 7 155H offers 16 cores / 22 threads — the Core Ultra 7 155H has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.8 GHz on the Core Ultra 7 155H — a 2.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses Meteor Lake-H (2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core Ultra 7 155H's 24,705 — a 52.7% lead for the Core Ultra 7 155H. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 24 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 7 155H.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 22+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+2% | 4.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz+6% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 24 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Meteor Lake-H (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 24,705+72% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,650 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,384 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,433 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 7 155H uses FCBGA2049 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600 on the Core Ultra 7 155H — the Core Ultra 7 155H supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 GB — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (Core Ultra 7 155H) — the Core Ultra 7 155H offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Meteor Lake SoC (Core Ultra 7 155H).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA2049 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5x-7467, DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+33% | 96 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core Ultra 7 155H). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) (Core Ultra 7 155H) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 7 155H targets Thin-and-light Performance / AI. Direct competitor: Core Ultra 7 155H rivals Ryzen 7 8840HS.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 7 155H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Intel Arc Graphics (8 Xe-cores) |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Desktop | Thin-and-light Performance / AI |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












