
Core i7-9700K

Core Ultra 9 285
Core i7-9700K vs Core Ultra 9 285 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Core Ultra 9 285 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Core Ultra 9 285: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $204 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core Ultra 9 285 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,397 vs 57,442).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 36 MB).
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 97.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $589 MSRP).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Core Ultra 9 285
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 12 MB).
- β Delivers 160.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 97.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($589 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- β Newer platform on LGA1851 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- β53% HIGHER MSRP$589 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Core Ultra 9 285 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Core Ultra 9 285 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Core Ultra 9 285
The Core Ultra 9 285 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Janeiro 2025 (recentemente). It is based on the Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 3 MB (per core). Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1851. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-6400. Passmark benchmark score: 57,442 points. Launch price was $579.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Core Ultra 9 285 offers 24 cores / 24 threads β the Core Ultra 9 285 has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.5 GHz on the Core Ultra 9 285 β a 11.5% clock advantage for the Core Ultra 9 285 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core Ultra 9 285 uses Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) (3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Core Ultra 9 285's 57,442 β a 119.8% lead for the Core Ultra 9 285. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 36 MB (total) on the Core Ultra 9 285.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 24+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.5 GHz+12% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+8433% | 3 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) | Arrow Lake-S (2024β2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 57,442+299% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 40,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 20,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core Ultra 9 285 uses LGA1851 (PCIe 5.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Core Ultra 9 285 β the Core Ultra 9 285 supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core Ultra 9 285 supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Core Ultra 9 285) β the Core Ultra 9 285 offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Intel 800 Series (Core Ultra 9 285).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1851 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking β a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs Yes (Core Ultra 9 285). Both include integrated graphics β UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Arc Graphics (Core Ultra 9 285) β useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Core Ultra 9 285 targets High-End Gaming.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Arc Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-End Gaming |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Core Ultra 9 285 came in at $589. On launch pricing ($385 vs $589), Core i7-9700K was $204 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 97.5 pts/$ for the Core Ultra 9 285 β making the Core Ultra 9 285 the 89.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Core Ultra 9 285 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-35% | $589 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 97.5+161% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














