Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 4484PX

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 4484PX

12 Cores24 Thrd120 WWMax: 5.6 GHz2024

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

0.0%

50,547

+251.1%

Ryzen 7 5800X3D

Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 375

Ryzen 9 5900X

Ryzen 9 7845HX

Ryzen 9 9950X

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 50,547).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4484PX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 4484PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Delivers 125.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌
55.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.

Core i7-9700K

2018

EPYC 4484PX

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $214 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +29.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 28 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Delivers 125.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 84.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than EPYC 4484PX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 50,547).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 4484PX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 28 PCIe lanes.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 84.4 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 4484PX moves to AM5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌
55.6% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 4484PX better than Core i7-9700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 4484PX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, EPYC 4484PX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 29.4% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 12 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 4484PX is the better fit. You are getting 251.1% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 4484PX is the smarter buy today. EPYC 4484PX is 55.6% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 29.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 125.7% better value on MSRP (84.4 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 4484PX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 12 MB, more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 4484PX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
1080p
low	308 FPS	271 FPS
medium	278 FPS	248 FPS
high	231 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	263 FPS
medium	221 FPS	216 FPS
high	178 FPS	171 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	154 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	182 FPS
medium	140 FPS	149 FPS
high	108 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	100 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 4484PX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
1080p
low	360 FPS	806 FPS
medium	321 FPS	657 FPS
high	291 FPS	488 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	404 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	648 FPS
medium	282 FPS	551 FPS
high	258 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	329 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	361 FPS
medium	221 FPS	311 FPS
high	208 FPS	273 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	230 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 4484PX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
1080p
low	360 FPS	1025 FPS
medium	360 FPS	1163 FPS
high	360 FPS	1100 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	875 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	970 FPS
medium	360 FPS	877 FPS
high	360 FPS	804 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	656 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	596 FPS
medium	360 FPS	518 FPS
high	360 FPS	465 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	393 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 4484PX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
1080p
low	360 FPS	1264 FPS
medium	360 FPS	1015 FPS
high	360 FPS	993 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	865 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	1035 FPS
medium	360 FPS	897 FPS
high	360 FPS	772 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	647 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	759 FPS
medium	360 FPS	662 FPS
high	360 FPS	577 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 4484PX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and EPYC 4484PX

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

EPYC 4484PX

The EPYC 4484PX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 May 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 50,547 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 4484PX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the EPYC 4484PX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.6 GHz on the EPYC 4484PX — a 13.3% clock advantage for the EPYC 4484PX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 4484PX uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the EPYC 4484PX's 50,547 — a 111.3% lead for the EPYC 4484PX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 4484PX.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.6 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4.4 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	14,397	50,547+251%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	24,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	2,950
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	17,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 4484PX uses AM5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5200 on the EPYC 4484PX — the EPYC 4484PX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 4484PX supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (EPYC 4484PX) — the EPYC 4484PX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and B650,X670,X870 (EPYC 4484PX).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
Socket	LGA1151	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR5-5200+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	192 GB+50%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 4484PX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V, AMD-Vi (EPYC 4484PX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon Graphics (EPYC 4484PX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, EPYC 4484PX targets Workstation / Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 4484PX rivals Ryzen 9 7900X3D.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 4484PX
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	Radeon Graphics
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V, AMD-Vi
Target Use	Desktop	Workstation / Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the EPYC 4484PX debuted at $599. On MSRP ($385 vs $599), the Core i7-9700K is $214 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 84.4 pts/$ for the EPYC 4484PX — making the EPYC 4484PX the 77.2% better value option.