Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 7371

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
VS
AMD

EPYC 7371

16 Cores32 Thrd200 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2018

Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 7371 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 7371 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 7371: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 95W instead of 200W, a 105W reduction.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while EPYC 7371 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 30,156).
  • ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
  • ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7371, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while EPYC 7371 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

EPYC 7371

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…+109.5% higher PassMark.
  • βœ…+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
  • βœ…Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • βœ…700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • ❌110.5% higher power demand at 200W vs 95W.
  • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than EPYC 7371?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7371 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 7371 is the stronger fit. You are getting 109.5% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that EPYC 7371 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 109.5% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
EPYC 7371 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 7371 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

EPYC 7371

The EPYC 7371 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 November 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Naples (2017βˆ’2018) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 170 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,156 points. Launch price was $1,550.

⚑

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 7371 offers 16 cores / 32 threads β€” the EPYC 7371 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.8 GHz on the EPYC 7371 β€” a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7371 uses Naples (2017βˆ’2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the EPYC 7371's 30,156 β€” a 70.7% lead for the EPYC 7371. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the EPYC 7371.

FeatureCore i7-9700KEPYC 7371
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+29%
3.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+16%
3.1 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019)
Naples (2017βˆ’2018)
PassMark
14,397
30,156+109%
Cinebench R23 Multi
β€”
15,000
Geekbench 6 Single
β€”
1,216
Geekbench 6 Multi
β€”
6,941
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7371 uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The EPYC 7371 supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β€” 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (EPYC 7371). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 128 (EPYC 7371) β€” the EPYC 7371 offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and SP3 platform (EPYC 7371).

FeatureCore i7-9700KEPYC 7371
Socket
LGA1151
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
8+300%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
16
128+700%
πŸ”§

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V, SVM (EPYC 7371). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the EPYC 7371 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, EPYC 7371 targets High-frequency Server Workloads. Direct competitor: EPYC 7371 rivals Xeon Gold 6134.

FeatureCore i7-9700KEPYC 7371
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
β€”
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, SVM
Target Use
Desktop
High-frequency Server Workloads