Core i7-9700K vs EPYC 8324P

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

EPYC 8324P

32 Cores64 Thrd180 WWMax: 3 GHz2023

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

0.0%

57,127

+296.8%

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Ryzen 7 9700X

Ryzen 9 5900XT

Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 7960X

Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,510 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 180W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while EPYC 8324P needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 57,127).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅+296.8% higher PassMark.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌89.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

EPYC 8324P

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $1,510 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Delivers 24.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,895 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 180W, a 85W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while EPYC 8324P needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+296.8% higher PassMark.
✅+966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 16.
✅Newer platform on SP6 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅500% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 57,127).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 128 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 8324P, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while EPYC 8324P moves to SP6 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 30.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,895 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌89.5% higher power demand at 180W vs 95W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is EPYC 8324P better than Core i7-9700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. EPYC 8324P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, EPYC 8324P is the better fit. You are getting 296.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

EPYC 8324P is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. EPYC 8324P is 392.2% more expensive on MSRP at $1,895 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 296.8% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 24.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 30.1 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

EPYC 8324P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with SP6 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 966.7% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 12 MB), more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/8, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

EPYC 8324P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
1080p
low	308 FPS	159 FPS
medium	278 FPS	131 FPS
high	231 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	87 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	142 FPS
medium	221 FPS	114 FPS
high	178 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	68 FPS
medium	140 FPS	58 FPS
high	108 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 8324P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
1080p
low	360 FPS	419 FPS
medium	321 FPS	369 FPS
high	291 FPS	300 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	344 FPS
medium	282 FPS	311 FPS
high	258 FPS	260 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	199 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	212 FPS
medium	221 FPS	195 FPS
high	208 FPS	164 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	132 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 8324P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
1080p
low	360 FPS	860 FPS
medium	360 FPS	786 FPS
high	360 FPS	760 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	682 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	664 FPS
medium	360 FPS	587 FPS
high	360 FPS	559 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	498 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	436 FPS
medium	360 FPS	345 FPS
high	360 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	251 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 8324P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
1080p
low	360 FPS	1022 FPS
medium	360 FPS	913 FPS
high	360 FPS	771 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	650 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	832 FPS
medium	360 FPS	712 FPS
high	360 FPS	598 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	490 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	599 FPS
medium	360 FPS	523 FPS
high	360 FPS	451 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	375 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open EPYC 8324P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and EPYC 8324P

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

EPYC 8324P

The EPYC 8324P is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 18 September 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Siena (2023−2024) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 2.65 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: SP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 57,127 points. Launch price was $1,895.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the EPYC 8324P offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the EPYC 8324P has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3 GHz on the EPYC 8324P — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.65 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 8324P uses Siena (2023−2024) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the EPYC 8324P's 57,127 — a 119.5% lead for the EPYC 8324P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 128 MB (total) on the EPYC 8324P.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+63%	3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+36%	2.65 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	128 MB (total)+967%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Siena (2023−2024)
PassMark	14,397	57,127+297%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 8324P uses SP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 4800 on the EPYC 8324P — the EPYC 8324P supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 8324P supports up to 1152 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 160% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 6 (EPYC 8324P). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 96 (EPYC 8324P) — the EPYC 8324P offers 80 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and SP6 (EPYC 8324P).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
Socket	LGA1151	SP6
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	4800+119900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+11650744%	1152
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	96+500%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the EPYC 8324P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the EPYC 8324P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: EPYC 8324P rivals Xeon Platinum 8452Y.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	EPYC 8324P
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the EPYC 8324P debuted at $1895. On MSRP ($385 vs $1895), the Core i7-9700K is $1510 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 30.1 pts/$ for the EPYC 8324P — making the Core i7-9700K the 21.5% better value option.