
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

M3 Pro 11-Core
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while M3 Pro 11-Core needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while M3 Pro 11-Core moves to none and DDR5.
M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018M3 Pro 11-Core
2023Why buy it
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while M3 Pro 11-Core needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +34.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Newer platform on none with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than M3 Pro 11-Core across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,861).
- βLaunch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while M3 Pro 11-Core mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- βOlder platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while M3 Pro 11-Core moves to none and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is M3 Pro 11-Core better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 56 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 399 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 309 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 230 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 184 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 593 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 400 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 248 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 621 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 540 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 494 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 443 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 396 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 342 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and M3 Pro 11-Core

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.
M3 Pro 11-Core
M3 Pro 11-Core
The M3 Pro 11-Core is manufactured by Apple. It was released in 30 October 2023 (2 years ago). It features 11 cores and 11 threads. Base frequency is 2.748 GHz, with boost up to 4.06 GHz. Built on 3 nm process technology. Socket: none. Memory support: LPDDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,861 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the M3 Pro 11-Core offers 11 cores / 11 threads β the M3 Pro 11-Core has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.06 GHz on the M3 Pro 11-Core β a 18.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.748 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the M3 Pro 11-Core's 24,861 β a 53.3% lead for the M3 Pro 11-Core.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 11 / 11+38% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+21% | 4.06 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+31% | 2.748 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | β |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | β |
| Process | 14 nm | 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) | β |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 24,861+73% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the M3 Pro 11-Core uses none (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | none |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (M3 Pro 11-Core). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the M3 Pro 11-Core requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | M3 Pro 11-Core |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












