
Core i7-9700K

Opteron 6386 SE
Core i7-9700K vs Opteron 6386 SE Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Opteron 6386 SE FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Opteron 6386 SE: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +65.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,007 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 527.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 6.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,392 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 140W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Opteron 6386 SE, which brings 16 cores / 16 threads.
Opteron 6386 SE
2012Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,291 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,392 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌47.4% higher power demand at 140W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Opteron 6386 SE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Opteron 6386 SE Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Opteron 6386 SE
The Opteron 6386 SE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 November 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Abu Dhabi (2012) architecture. It features 16 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: G34. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 8,291 points. Launch price was $2,408.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Opteron 6386 SE offers 16 cores / 16 threads — the Opteron 6386 SE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Opteron 6386 SE — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses Abu Dhabi (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Opteron 6386 SE's 8,291 — a 53.8% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Opteron 6386 SE.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+40% | 3.5 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+1500% | 16 MB |
| Process | 14 nm-56% | 32 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Abu Dhabi (2012) |
| PassMark | 14,397+74% | 8,291 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Opteron 6386 SE uses G34 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | G34 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Opteron 6386 SE). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Opteron 6386 SE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Opteron 6386 SE came in at $1392. On launch pricing ($385 vs $1392), Core i7-9700K was $1007 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 6.0 pts/$ for the Opteron 6386 SE — making the Core i7-9700K the 145% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Opteron 6386 SE |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-72% | $1392 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+523% | 6.0 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2012 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















