
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Pentium 3825U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +729.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Pentium 3825U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Pentium 3825U
2015Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Pentium 3825U
2015Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +729.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Pentium 3825U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Pentium 3825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,396 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Pentium 3825U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 28 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 20 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 35 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 35 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Pentium 3825U

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Pentium 3825U
Pentium 3825U
The Pentium 3825U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,396 points. Launch price was $161.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium 3825U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 1.9 GHz on the Pentium 3825U — a 88.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium 3825U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Pentium 3825U's 1,396 — a 164.6% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 2 MB (total) on the Pentium 3825U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+300% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+158% | 1.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+89% | 1.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+500% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Broadwell-U (2015) |
| PassMark | 14,397+931% | 1,396 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium 3825U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA1168 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Pentium 3825U). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Pentium 3825U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium 3825U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












