Core i7-9700K vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2007
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-9700K vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +811.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Delivers 279.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Pentium Dual-Core E2200 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 285% HIGHER MSRP
    $385 MSRPvs$100 MSRP
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

2007

Why buy it

  • Costs $285 less on MSRP ($100 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (985 vs 14,397).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 9.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($100 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Pentium Dual-Core E2200?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 811.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1361.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 811.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1361.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 285.0% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $100 MSRP, and it still gives you a 811.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 279.6% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 9.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2007) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs Pentium Dual-Core E2200 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Pentium Dual-Core E2200

The Pentium Dual-Core E2200 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the NetBurst (2000−2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 985 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 2.2 GHz on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — a 76.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses NetBurst (2000−2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Pentium Dual-Core E2200's 985 — a 174.4% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 0 kB on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200.

FeatureCore i7-9700KPentium Dual-Core E2200
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+123%
2.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+25500%
1 MB (total)
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
NetBurst (2000−2006)
PassMark
14,397+1362%
985
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR2-800 on the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — the Core i7-9700K supports 233.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 0 (Pentium Dual-Core E2200) — the Core i7-9700K offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

FeatureCore i7-9700KPentium Dual-Core E2200
Socket
LGA1151
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+173%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666+233%
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+3100%
4 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x (Pentium Dual-Core E2200). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Pentium Dual-Core E2200 targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KPentium Dual-Core E2200
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
VT-x
Target Use
Desktop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 came in at $100. On launch pricing ($385 vs $100), Pentium Dual-Core E2200 was $285 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 9.8 pts/$ for the Pentium Dual-Core E2200 — making the Core i7-9700K the 116.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-9700KPentium Dual-Core E2200
MSRP
$385
$100-74%
Performance per Dollar
37.4+282%
9.8
Release Date
2018
2007

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.