
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Pentium G3220
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +517.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌613% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$54 MSRP
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
Pentium G3220
2013Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($54 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-9700K
2018Pentium G3220
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +517.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 3 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $331 less on MSRP ($54 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 54W instead of 95W, a 41W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌613% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$54 MSRP
- ❌75.9% higher power demand at 95W vs 54W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,885 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (3 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Pentium G3220?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 47 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 47 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Pentium G3220

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Pentium G3220
Pentium G3220
The Pentium G3220 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 53 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,885 points. Launch price was $71.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Pentium G3220 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3 GHz on the Pentium G3220 — a 48.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Pentium G3220 uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Pentium G3220's 1,885 — a 153.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 3 MB (total) on the Pentium G3220.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+300% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+63% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+300% | 3 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 14,397+664% | 1,885 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Pentium G3220 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR3-1333 on the Pentium G3220 — the Core i7-9700K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+300% | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x (Pentium G3220). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and HD Graphics (Pentium G3220) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Pentium G3220 targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | HD Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x |
| Target Use | Desktop | Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Pentium G3220 debuted at $54. On MSRP ($385 vs $54), the Pentium G3220 is $331 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 34.9 pts/$ for the Pentium G3220 — making the Core i7-9700K the 6.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Pentium G3220 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $54-86% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+7% | 34.9 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












