
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Phenom II X3 720
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +625.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 203.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Phenom II X3 720 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌196.2% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X3 720.
Phenom II X3 720
2010Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Core i7-9700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,600 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Phenom II X3 720
2010Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +625.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 6 MB).
- ✅Delivers 203.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 12.3 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $130 MSRP).
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Phenom II X3 720 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $255 less on MSRP ($130 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Included), unlike Core i7-9700K.
Trade-offs
- ❌196.2% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$130 MSRP
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Phenom II X3 720.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,600 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (6 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 12.3 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($130 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Phenom II X3 720?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 31 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 27 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 40 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 40 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Phenom II X3 720

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Phenom II X3 720
Phenom II X3 720
The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Phenom II X3 720 offers 3 cores / 3 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 5 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses Heka (2009−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Phenom II X3 720's 1,600 — a 160% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+167% | 3 / 3 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+75% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+29% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+100% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm-69% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Heka (2009−2010) |
| PassMark | 14,397+800% | 1,600 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 380 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 980 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Phenom II X3 720 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 720 — the Core i7-9700K supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0+50% | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666+33% | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+700% | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Phenom II X3 720). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Phenom II X3 720 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Legacy Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Phenom II X3 720 debuted at $130. On MSRP ($385 vs $130), the Phenom II X3 720 is $255 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 12.3 pts/$ for the Phenom II X3 720 — making the Core i7-9700K the 100.9% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Phenom II X3 720 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $130-66% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+204% | 12.3 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












