Core i7-9700K vs PRO A10-8850B

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
VS
AMD

PRO A10-8850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2015

Core i7-9700K vs PRO A10-8850B Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs PRO A10-8850B FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs PRO A10-8850B: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +175.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while PRO A10-8850B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while PRO A10-8850B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

PRO A10-8850B

2015

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (3,752 vs 14,397).
    • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-9700K better than PRO A10-8850B?
    Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 175.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 283.7% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 175.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 283.7% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 175.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/4. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i7-9700K vs PRO A10-8850B Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-9700K

    The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

    AMD

    PRO A10-8850B

    The PRO A10-8850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 September 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 3,752 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the PRO A10-8850B offers 4 cores / 4 threads β€” the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.1 GHz on the PRO A10-8850B β€” a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture (14 nm), while the PRO A10-8850B uses Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016) (28 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the PRO A10-8850B's 3,752 β€” a 117.3% lead for the Core i7-9700K.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KPRO A10-8850B
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 8+100%
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz+20%
    4.1 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz
    3.9 GHz+8%
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)
    β€”
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    4096 kB+1500%
    Process
    14 nm-50%
    28 nm
    Architecture
    Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019)
    Godaveri (2014βˆ’2016)
    PassMark
    14,397+284%
    3,752
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the PRO A10-8850B uses FM2+ (PCIe 3.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KPRO A10-8850B
    Socket
    LGA1151
    FM2+
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0
    PCIe 3.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2666
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (PRO A10-8850B). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the PRO A10-8850B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KPRO A10-8850B
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    β€”
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 630
    β€”
    Unlocked
    Yes
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    β€”
    Target Use
    Desktop
    β€”