Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +111.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 73.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $89 MSRP).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

2019

Why buy it

  • Costs $296 less on MSRP ($89 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Delivers 95.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 73.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($89 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (6,499 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 111.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 121.5% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 111.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 121.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is still the better call for a fresh build. Core i7-9700K comes in 332.6% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $89 MSRP, and it still gives you a 111.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the better recommendation now. Giving up that much average FPS in the shared benchmark data is simply too much for that budget trade-off.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,499 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G's 6,499 — a 75.6% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+23%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+12700%
2 MB
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
14,397+122%
6,499
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Socket
LGA1151
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB+100%
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G). Both include integrated graphics UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon Vega 8 (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
Integrated GPU
Yes
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Radeon Vega 8
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G came in at $89. On launch pricing ($385 vs $89), Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G was $296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 73.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G the 64.5% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP
$385
$89-77%
Performance per Dollar
37.4
73.0+95%
Release Date
2018
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.