Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

4 Cores4 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

+111.3%

6,813

0.0%

Ryzen Embedded R1505G

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +109.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $286 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +109.2% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $286 less on MSRP ($99 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($99 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 68.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $99 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,813 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 109.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 111.3% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 109.2% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 111.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i7-9700K is 288.9% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $99 MSRP, and it gives you a 109.2% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. Giving up that much average FPS in the shared benchmark data is simply too much for that budget trade-off.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
1080p
low	308 FPS	164 FPS
medium	278 FPS	140 FPS
high	231 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	141 FPS
medium	221 FPS	119 FPS
high	178 FPS	92 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	65 FPS
medium	140 FPS	58 FPS
high	108 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	321 FPS	170 FPS
high	291 FPS	157 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	170 FPS
medium	282 FPS	147 FPS
high	258 FPS	133 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	128 FPS
medium	221 FPS	111 FPS
high	208 FPS	88 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	66 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	137 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	170 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	170 FPS
medium	360 FPS	170 FPS
high	360 FPS	170 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	170 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE

The Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 6,813 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE's 6,813 — a 71.5% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 4
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+23%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+200%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	14,397+111%	6,813

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE debuted at $99. On MSRP ($385 vs $99), the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE is $286 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 68.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE — making the Ryzen 3 PRO 3200GE the 59.2% better value option.