PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 23,167).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Ryzen 5 240

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 5 240

2025

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 240 needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +37.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 240 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 23,167).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 240 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 240 better than Core i7-9700K?

Yes. Ryzen 5 240 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 37.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 60.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 240 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 37.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 240 is the better fit. You are getting 60.9% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 240 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 5 240 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 37.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 240 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP8 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 240 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
1080p
low	308 FPS	265 FPS
medium	278 FPS	239 FPS
high	231 FPS	200 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	172 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	234 FPS
medium	221 FPS	191 FPS
high	178 FPS	156 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	138 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	162 FPS
medium	140 FPS	135 FPS
high	108 FPS	104 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	91 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 240

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
1080p
low	360 FPS	426 FPS
medium	321 FPS	353 FPS
high	291 FPS	308 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	271 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	369 FPS
medium	282 FPS	320 FPS
high	258 FPS	281 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	240 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	265 FPS
medium	221 FPS	235 FPS
high	208 FPS	218 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	183 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 240

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
1080p
low	360 FPS	579 FPS
medium	360 FPS	579 FPS
high	360 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	579 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	579 FPS
medium	360 FPS	579 FPS
high	360 FPS	520 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	449 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	501 FPS
medium	360 FPS	445 FPS
high	360 FPS	380 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	315 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 240

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
1080p
low	360 FPS	579 FPS
medium	360 FPS	579 FPS
high	360 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	579 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	579 FPS
medium	360 FPS	579 FPS
high	360 FPS	579 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	545 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	565 FPS
medium	360 FPS	506 FPS
high	360 FPS	450 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	386 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 240

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 240

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 5 240

The Ryzen 5 240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 4.3 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 23,167 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 240 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 240 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 240 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 240's 23,167 — a 46.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 240. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 240.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4.3 GHz+19%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Hawk Point (2024−2025)
PassMark	14,397	23,167+61%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 240 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 240
Socket	LGA1151	FP8
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 240). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 240 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.