Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 6600HS

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 5 6600HS

6 Cores12 Thrd35 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

0.0%

18,975

+31.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 6600HS needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,975).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

2022

Why buy it

✅+31.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 5 6600HS

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.0% higher average FPS across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 6600HS needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+31.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,975).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 6600HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 6600HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 6 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 6600HS better than Core i7-9700K?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-9700K is ahead with a 3.0% average FPS lead across 6 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600HS pulls ahead with 31.8% better PassMark. Ryzen 5 6600HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 6600HS is the better fit. You are getting 31.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 6600HS is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 5 6600HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 31.8% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 6600HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 6600HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low	308 FPS	167 FPS
medium	278 FPS	145 FPS
high	231 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	142 FPS
medium	221 FPS	122 FPS
high	178 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	79 FPS
medium	140 FPS	72 FPS
high	108 FPS	57 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	45 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 6600HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	353 FPS
medium	321 FPS	294 FPS
high	291 FPS	259 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	228 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	306 FPS
medium	282 FPS	259 FPS
high	258 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	203 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	227 FPS
medium	221 FPS	196 FPS
high	208 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	146 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 6600HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	474 FPS
medium	360 FPS	457 FPS
high	360 FPS	414 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	344 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	474 FPS
medium	360 FPS	400 FPS
high	360 FPS	360 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	301 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	340 FPS
medium	360 FPS	284 FPS
high	360 FPS	246 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	193 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 6600HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	474 FPS
medium	360 FPS	474 FPS
high	360 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	474 FPS
medium	360 FPS	474 FPS
high	360 FPS	474 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	474 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	474 FPS
medium	360 FPS	471 FPS
high	360 FPS	420 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	364 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 6600HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 6600HS

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 5 6600HS

The Ryzen 5 6600HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Janeiro 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 18,975 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 6600HS offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 5 6600HS — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 6600HS's 18,975 — a 27.4% lead for the Ryzen 5 6600HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 6600HS.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+9%	4.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Rembrandt-HS (Zen 3+) (2022)
PassMark	14,397	18,975+32%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 6600HS
Socket	LGA1151	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 6600HS). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 6600HS requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.