PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7400F needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,529).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 170.2 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 5 7400F

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +51.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $235 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 355.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 5 7400F

2025

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 7400F needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +51.9% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Costs $235 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 355.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 170.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 7400F across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,529).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 170.2 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 7400F better than Core i7-9700K?

Yes. Ryzen 5 7400F is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 51.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data, 77.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 7400F is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 51.9% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 7400F is the better fit. You are getting 77.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 7400F is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 5 7400F is $235 cheaper on MSRP at $150 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 51.9% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 355.1% better value on MSRP (170.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 7400F is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with AM5 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 7400F Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
1080p
low	308 FPS	153 FPS
medium	278 FPS	129 FPS
high	231 FPS	114 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	94 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	137 FPS
medium	221 FPS	113 FPS
high	178 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	79 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	77 FPS
medium	140 FPS	68 FPS
high	108 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	43 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 7400F

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
1080p
low	360 FPS	450 FPS
medium	321 FPS	378 FPS
high	291 FPS	317 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	281 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	384 FPS
medium	282 FPS	329 FPS
high	258 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	246 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	256 FPS
medium	221 FPS	224 FPS
high	208 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	179 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 7400F

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
1080p
low	360 FPS	638 FPS
medium	360 FPS	638 FPS
high	360 FPS	638 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	638 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	638 FPS
medium	360 FPS	638 FPS
high	360 FPS	638 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	605 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	524 FPS
medium	360 FPS	452 FPS
high	360 FPS	390 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	322 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 7400F

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
1080p
low	360 FPS	638 FPS
medium	360 FPS	638 FPS
high	360 FPS	638 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	638 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	638 FPS
medium	360 FPS	638 FPS
high	360 FPS	638 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	612 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	638 FPS
medium	360 FPS	590 FPS
high	360 FPS	521 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	437 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 7400F

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 7400F

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 5 7400F

The Ryzen 5 7400F is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 25,529 points. Launch price was $229.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 7400F offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 7400F — a 4.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 7400F uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 7400F's 25,529 — a 55.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 7400F. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 7400F.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+4%	4.7 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	32 MB (total)+167%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	5 nm-64%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Raphael (2023−2025)
PassMark	14,397	25,529+77%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 7400F uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
Socket	LGA1151	AM5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 5.0+67%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 7400F). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 7400F requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 7400F
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 7400F debuted at $150. On MSRP ($385 vs $150), the Ryzen 5 7400F is $235 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 170.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 7400F — making the Ryzen 5 7400F the 127.9% better value option.