
Core i7-9700K

Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +65.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- β Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 44.2 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $193 MSRP).
- β46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
2018Why buy it
- β Costs $192 less on MSRP ($193 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- β Delivers 18.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.2 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($193 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (8,527 vs 14,397).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- βNo integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 May 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Raven Ridge (2017β2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 8,527 points. Launch price was $169.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G offers 4 cores / 8 threads β the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β a 22.7% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses Raven Ridge (2017β2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G's 8,527 β a 51.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+26% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018β2019) | Raven Ridge (2017β2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397+69% | 8,527 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | No | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | β |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | β |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | β |
| Unlocked | Yes | β |
| AVX-512 | No | β |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | β |
| Target Use | Desktop | β |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G came in at $193. On launch pricing ($385 vs $193), Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G was $192 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 44.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G β making the Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G the 16.6% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 2400G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $193-50% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 44.2+18% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2018 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














