PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +68.8% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $236 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +68.8% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $236 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 37.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 51.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($149 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 51.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,677 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 68.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data and 87.5% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 68.8% more average FPS across 47 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 87.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Core i7-9700K is 158.4% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $149 MSRP, and it gives you a 68.8% average FPS lead across 47 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE only looks stronger on raw value math because it is so cheap, but its absolute performance tier is too low to be the smarter recommendation now. Giving up that much average FPS in the shared benchmark data is simply too much for that budget trade-off.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
1080p
low	308 FPS	177 FPS
medium	278 FPS	155 FPS
high	231 FPS	126 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	147 FPS
medium	221 FPS	124 FPS
high	178 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	66 FPS
medium	140 FPS	59 FPS
high	108 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	321 FPS	189 FPS
high	291 FPS	173 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	136 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	187 FPS
medium	282 FPS	161 FPS
high	258 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	120 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	138 FPS
medium	221 FPS	123 FPS
high	208 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	70 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	192 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	192 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
1080p
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	192 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	192 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	192 FPS
medium	360 FPS	192 FPS
high	360 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	192 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 7,677 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE's 7,677 — a 60.9% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+23%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+9%	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+200%	4 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	12 nm-14%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Picasso (2019−2022)
PassMark	14,397+88%	7,677

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE debuted at $149. On MSRP ($385 vs $149), the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE is $236 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 51.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 3400GE the 31.8% better value option.