
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +90.0% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,928 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +90.0% higher average FPS across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 42 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,928 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 173 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 173 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,928 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U — a 27.9% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses Picasso (2019−2022) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U's 6,928 — a 70% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+32% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Picasso (2019−2022) |
| PassMark | 14,397+108% | 6,928 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












