
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 3700U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +86.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Ryzen 7 3700U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,049 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 7 3700U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +86.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 12) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3700U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (7,049 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 7 3700U?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 139 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 116 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 115 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 68 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 176 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3700U

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 7 3700U
Ryzen 7 3700U
The Ryzen 7 3700U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,049 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700U offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700U — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 3700U's 7,049 — a 68.5% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3700U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+23% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+57% | 2.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+200% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 12 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Picasso-U (Zen+) (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 14,397+104% | 7,049 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 3,826 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 794 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,115 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700U uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 12 (Ryzen 7 3700U) — the Core i7-9700K offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and FP5 (Ryzen 7 3700U).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 3700U). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon RX Vega 10 (Ryzen 7 3700U) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 3700U targets Mainstream Laptop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon RX Vega 10 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | Mainstream Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












