Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3750H

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +84.6% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 3750H needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 3750H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.

Ryzen 7 3750H

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (7,990 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 12 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen 7 3750H?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 84.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data and 80.2% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 84.6% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 80.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-9700K is at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 84.6% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3750H is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
1080p
low308 FPS169 FPS
medium278 FPS150 FPS
high231 FPS120 FPS
ultra182 FPS98 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS142 FPS
medium221 FPS121 FPS
high178 FPS95 FPS
ultra143 FPS76 FPS
4K
low170 FPS67 FPS
medium140 FPS61 FPS
high108 FPS48 FPS
ultra95 FPS37 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
1080p
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium321 FPS179 FPS
high291 FPS164 FPS
ultra259 FPS131 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS178 FPS
medium282 FPS153 FPS
high258 FPS139 FPS
ultra225 FPS116 FPS
4K
low249 FPS132 FPS
medium221 FPS115 FPS
high208 FPS92 FPS
ultra179 FPS68 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
1080p
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra360 FPS200 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra360 FPS200 FPS
4K
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra318 FPS200 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
1080p
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra360 FPS200 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra360 FPS200 FPS
4K
low360 FPS200 FPS
medium360 FPS200 FPS
high360 FPS200 FPS
ultra360 FPS200 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 3750H

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3750H

The Ryzen 7 3750H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (Zen+) (2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,990 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3750H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3750H — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses Picasso (Zen+) (2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 3750H's 7,990 — a 57.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 3750H.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+23%
4 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+57%
2.3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+200%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Picasso (Zen+) (2019)
PassMark
14,397+80%
7,990
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 3750H uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
Socket
LGA1151
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3750H). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 3750H requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 3750H
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop