Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 5825U

8 Cores16 Thrd15 WWMax: 4.5 GHz2022

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 5825U needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,050).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
  • Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 5825U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Ryzen 7 5825U

2022

Why buy it

  • +25.4% higher PassMark.
  • +33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 5825U better than Core i7-9700K?
It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-9700K is ahead with a 2.2% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825U pulls ahead with 25.4% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 5825U also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 5825U is the better fit. You are getting 25.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 5825U is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 5825U is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 25.4% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 5825U is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
1080p
low308 FPS173 FPS
medium278 FPS149 FPS
high231 FPS120 FPS
ultra182 FPS101 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS148 FPS
medium221 FPS125 FPS
high178 FPS101 FPS
ultra143 FPS84 FPS
4K
low170 FPS82 FPS
medium140 FPS74 FPS
high108 FPS59 FPS
ultra95 FPS46 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
1080p
low360 FPS236 FPS
medium321 FPS201 FPS
high291 FPS176 FPS
ultra259 FPS156 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS203 FPS
medium282 FPS179 FPS
high258 FPS161 FPS
ultra225 FPS138 FPS
4K
low249 FPS140 FPS
medium221 FPS127 FPS
high208 FPS121 FPS
ultra179 FPS106 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
1080p
low360 FPS451 FPS
medium360 FPS451 FPS
high360 FPS451 FPS
ultra360 FPS426 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS451 FPS
medium360 FPS437 FPS
high360 FPS392 FPS
ultra360 FPS324 FPS
4K
low360 FPS375 FPS
medium360 FPS316 FPS
high360 FPS278 FPS
ultra318 FPS219 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
1080p
low360 FPS451 FPS
medium360 FPS451 FPS
high360 FPS451 FPS
ultra360 FPS451 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS451 FPS
medium360 FPS451 FPS
high360 FPS451 FPS
ultra360 FPS451 FPS
4K
low360 FPS451 FPS
medium360 FPS451 FPS
high360 FPS402 FPS
ultra360 FPS345 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 5825U

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen 7 5825U

The Ryzen 7 5825U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,050 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 5825U's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825U — a 8.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825U uses Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 5825U's 18,050 — a 22.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 5825U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825U.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
8 / 16
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+9%
4.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+80%
2 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Barcelo-U (Zen 3) (2022−2023)
PassMark
14,397
18,050+25%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825U uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
Socket
LGA1151
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 5825U). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 5825U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen 7 5825U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop