PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 22,897).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+59% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Why buy it

✅+59% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 35W instead of 95W, a 60W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 22,897).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌171.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 24 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7735HS better than Core i7-9700K?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-9700K is ahead with a 8.1% average FPS lead across 24 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735HS pulls ahead with 59% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 7735HS also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better fit. You are getting 59% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen 7 7735HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 59% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7735HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	308 FPS	246 FPS
medium	278 FPS	230 FPS
high	231 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	217 FPS
medium	221 FPS	184 FPS
high	178 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	152 FPS
medium	140 FPS	129 FPS
high	108 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	87 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	464 FPS
medium	321 FPS	392 FPS
high	291 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	397 FPS
medium	282 FPS	347 FPS
high	258 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	274 FPS
medium	221 FPS	246 FPS
high	208 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	195 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	572 FPS
medium	360 FPS	572 FPS
high	360 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	403 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	572 FPS
medium	360 FPS	520 FPS
high	360 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	365 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	452 FPS
medium	360 FPS	380 FPS
high	360 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	272 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	360 FPS	572 FPS
medium	360 FPS	572 FPS
high	360 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	572 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	572 FPS
medium	360 FPS	572 FPS
high	360 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	533 FPS
medium	360 FPS	487 FPS
high	360 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	376 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 7735HS

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 7735HS's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — a 3.1% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 7735HS's 22,897 — a 45.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+3%	4.75 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512 kB (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	6 nm-57%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023)
PassMark	14,397	22,897+59%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	13,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — the Ryzen 7 7735HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7735HS) — the Ryzen 7 7735HS offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and SoC (Ryzen 7 7735HS).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Socket	LGA1151	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	LPDDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735HS). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen 7 7735HS) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	Radeon 680M
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	High Performance Laptop