
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 8745HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8745HX across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 32,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Ryzen 7 8745HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 7 8745HX
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +55.7% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+166.7% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 8745HX across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 32,620).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 8745HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 8745HX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 254 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 86 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 620 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 529 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 332 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 310 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 277 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 735 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 653 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 560 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 701 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 564 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 304 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 772 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 755 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 663 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 568 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 509 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 399 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 8745HX

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 7 8745HX
Ryzen 7 8745HX
The Ryzen 7 8745HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 April 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 32,620 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 8745HX's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 8745HX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 8745HX's 32,620 — a 77.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 8745HX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 8745HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 32 MB (total)+167% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 32,620+127% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 18,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,700 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 13,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 8745HX uses FL1 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 7 8745HX — the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 7 8745HX) — the Ryzen 7 8745HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and FL1 (Ryzen 7 8745HX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 7 8745HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 8745HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 7 8745HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 8745HX targets High-end Gaming Laptop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 7 8745HX rivals Core i7-14700HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 8745HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-end Gaming Laptop |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











