Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

0.0%

15,570

+8.1%

Ryzen 3 7320U

FX-9590

Ryzen 5 PRO 4650U

Ryzen Embedded V3C18I

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 15,570).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

2017

Why buy it

✅+8.1% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
3.6% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

2017

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +20.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $14 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+8.1% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 15,570).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
3.6% HIGHER MSRP
$399 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X better than Core i7-9700K?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Core i7-9700K is ahead with a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X pulls ahead with 8.1% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X also has the bigger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the better fit. You are getting 8.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is 3.6% more expensive on MSRP at $399 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 8.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Core i7-9700K is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 20.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 4.4% better value on MSRP (39.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
1080p
low	308 FPS	185 FPS
medium	278 FPS	160 FPS
high	231 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	105 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	152 FPS
medium	221 FPS	125 FPS
high	178 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	78 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	67 FPS
medium	140 FPS	59 FPS
high	108 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
1080p
low	360 FPS	289 FPS
medium	321 FPS	256 FPS
high	291 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	255 FPS
medium	282 FPS	231 FPS
high	258 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	169 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	185 FPS
medium	221 FPS	172 FPS
high	208 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	125 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
1080p
low	360 FPS	389 FPS
medium	360 FPS	389 FPS
high	360 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	389 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	389 FPS
medium	360 FPS	389 FPS
high	360 FPS	377 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	320 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	364 FPS
medium	360 FPS	295 FPS
high	360 FPS	264 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	214 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
1080p
low	360 FPS	389 FPS
medium	360 FPS	389 FPS
high	360 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	389 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	389 FPS
medium	360 FPS	389 FPS
high	360 FPS	389 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	389 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	389 FPS
medium	360 FPS	389 FPS
high	360 FPS	372 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	323 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X

The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,570 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — a 25.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X's 15,570 — a 7.8% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+29%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+6%	3.4 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	16 MB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	14,397	15,570+8%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X uses AM4 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X) — the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Socket	LGA1151	AM4
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	24+50%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	Desktop

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X debuted at $399. On MSRP ($385 vs $399), the Core i7-9700K is $14 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 39.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X — making the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X the 4.3% better value option.