
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,531).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1087.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 8W.
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 95W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 95W, a 87W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 24,531).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌1087.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 8W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 613 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 558 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U
The Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 May 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: LPDDR5x, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 24,531 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U — a 4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U's 24,531 — a 52.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 16 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 8 MB+3100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Phoenix (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 24,531+70% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 7 PRO 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











