
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 8945HX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945HX across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 53,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Ryzen 9 8945HX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 9 8945HX
2025Why buy it
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +52.8% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FL1 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 8945HX across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 53,211).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 8945HX mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 8945HX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 180 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 217 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 147 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 114 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 102 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 365 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 212 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 678 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 600 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 514 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 542 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 397 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 301 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1071 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 966 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 843 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 759 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 840 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 746 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 564 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 553 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 420 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 9 8945HX

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 9 8945HX
Ryzen 9 8945HX
The Ryzen 9 8945HX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-04-01. It is based on the Dragon Range (2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: FL1. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 53,211 points. Launch price was $700.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 8945HX offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Ryzen 9 8945HX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 8945HX — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 8945HX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 8945HX uses Dragon Range (2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 9 8945HX's 53,211 — a 114.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 8945HX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 8945HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Dragon Range (2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 53,211+270% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 8945HX uses FL1 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5600 on the Ryzen 9 8945HX — the Ryzen 9 8945HX supports 199.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 96 — 28.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 8945HX) — the Ryzen 9 8945HX offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and FL1 (Ryzen 9 8945HX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FL1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5600+139900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+139810033% | 96 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 8945HX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen 9 8945HX). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and AMD Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 8945HX) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 8945HX rivals Core Ultra 9 275HX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 8945HX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











