
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 54,530).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9900X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.6% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 192.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌29.6% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 9 9900X
2024Why buy it
- ✅Costs $114 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +56.6% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 192.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 109.3 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅50% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 54,530).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 109.3 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9900X moves to AM5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌29.6% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 467 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 534 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 321 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 266 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 224 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 899 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 711 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 618 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 726 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 492 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 322 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1126 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 989 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 862 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 766 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 774 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 580 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 644 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 569 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 502 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 433 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 9 9900X

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 9 9900X
Ryzen 9 9900X
The Ryzen 9 9900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 15 August 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 54,530 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 9900X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 9 9900X's 54,530 — a 116.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.6 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 54,530+279% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 33,003 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,401 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 19,756 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 9900X uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X — the Ryzen 9 9900X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 9900X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 24 (Ryzen 9 9900X) — the Ryzen 9 9900X offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and A620,B650,X670,X870 (Ryzen 9 9900X).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 24+50% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 9900X supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon 610M (Ryzen 9 9900X) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 610M |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9900X debuted at $499. On MSRP ($385 vs $499), the Core i7-9700K is $114 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 109.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9900X — making the Ryzen 9 9900X the 98% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 9900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-23% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 109.3+192% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











