
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 46,828).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 206.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.2% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $24 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +96.4% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Delivers 206.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 114.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($409 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 46,828).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 114.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $409 MSRP).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Trade-offs
- ❌6.2% HIGHER MSRP$409 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 110 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 426 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 384 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 250 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1025 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1118 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 1041 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 875 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 940 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 754 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 656 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 378 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1171 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 981 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 854 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1019 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 888 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 762 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 754 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 658 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 569 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen 9 PRO 7945

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
Ryzen 9 PRO 7945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Raphael (2023−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 46,828 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses Raphael (2023−2025) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945's 46,828 — a 105.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Raphael (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 46,828+225% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 28,905 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,206 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 16,832 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and AMD X670E,AMD X670,AMD B650E,AMD B650,AMD A620 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 28+75% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs true (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 9 PRO 7945) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 rivals Core i9-13900.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon Graphics |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 debuted at $409. On MSRP ($385 vs $409), the Core i7-9700K is $24 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 114.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 — making the Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 the 101.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen 9 PRO 7945 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-6% | $409 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4 | 114.5+206% |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











