PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 390 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 41,834).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.

Ryzen AI Max 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +45.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen AI Max 390

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +45.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 95W, a 40W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
✅75% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen AI Max 390 across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 41,834).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌72.7% higher power demand at 95W vs 55W.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 390 better than Core i7-9700K?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 45.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data, 190.6% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 45.5% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better fit. You are getting 190.6% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 390 is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen AI Max 390 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 45.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 390 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2018), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of LGA1151, 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/8. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	308 FPS	265 FPS
medium	278 FPS	241 FPS
high	231 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	252 FPS
medium	221 FPS	206 FPS
high	178 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	175 FPS
medium	140 FPS	143 FPS
high	108 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	96 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	360 FPS	671 FPS
medium	321 FPS	578 FPS
high	291 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	376 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	564 FPS
medium	282 FPS	503 FPS
high	258 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	318 FPS
medium	221 FPS	288 FPS
high	208 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	219 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	360 FPS	769 FPS
medium	360 FPS	602 FPS
high	360 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	668 FPS
medium	360 FPS	527 FPS
high	360 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	478 FPS
medium	360 FPS	395 FPS
high	360 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	292 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen AI Max 390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	360 FPS	1046 FPS
medium	360 FPS	953 FPS
high	360 FPS	833 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	751 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	838 FPS
medium	360 FPS	746 FPS
high	360 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	616 FPS
medium	360 FPS	552 FPS
high	360 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	422 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen AI Max 390

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen AI Max 390

The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max 390 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — a 2% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen AI Max 390's 41,834 — a 97.6% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5 GHz+2%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	64 MB (total)+433%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+300%
Process	14 nm	4 nm-71%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	14,397	41,834+191%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) — the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 12 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
Socket	LGA1151	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	8000+199900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+104857500%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	28+75%

🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 390). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and AMD Radeon 8050S (Ryzen AI Max 390) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen AI Max 390
Integrated GPU	Yes	Yes
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	Yes	Yes
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($385 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $385 cheaper.