Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Embedded V1605B

CPU

GPU

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 Cores8 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.6 GHz2018

Popular choices:

•••••••••

Performance Spectrum - CPU

Core i7-9700K

8 / 8

14,397

+114.1%

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

4 / 8

6,724

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +131.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V1605B needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

✅Costs $235 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +131.3% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V1605B needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Costs $235 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 44.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 15W instead of 95W, a 80W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 37.4 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
❌533.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 15W.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 12 MB).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?

Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 131.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 114.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 131.3% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 114.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the smarter buy by a wide margin for any fresh desktop build. Core i7-9700K is 156.7% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $150 MSRP, and it gives you a 131.3% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen Embedded V1605B only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop CPU, not because it is a serious desktop gaming option. It simply cannot keep up with modern games, especially when the gap is already 131.3% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-9700K is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 500% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 2 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Ryzen Embedded V1605B Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1080p
low	308 FPS	168 FPS
medium	278 FPS	149 FPS
high	231 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	98 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	142 FPS
medium	221 FPS	121 FPS
high	178 FPS	95 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	76 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	67 FPS
medium	140 FPS	61 FPS
high	108 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	37 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1080p
low	360 FPS	104 FPS
medium	321 FPS	91 FPS
high	291 FPS	86 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	68 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	88 FPS
medium	282 FPS	77 FPS
high	258 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	60 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	66 FPS
medium	221 FPS	59 FPS
high	208 FPS	47 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	34 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1080p
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	168 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	168 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen Embedded V1605B

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
1080p
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	168 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	168 FPS
medium	360 FPS	168 FPS
high	360 FPS	168 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	168 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Embedded V1605B

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Ryzen Embedded V1605B

The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 30.6% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 72.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+36%	3.6 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+500%	2 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	512K (per core)+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark	14,397+114%	6,724

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Socket	LGA1151	FP5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V1605B). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Integrated GPU	Yes	—
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	—
Unlocked	Yes	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	—
Target Use	Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B debuted at $150. On MSRP ($385 vs $150), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is $235 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen Embedded V1605B the 18.1% better value option.