
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V2546
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.3% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Ryzen Embedded V2546
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen Embedded V2546
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +41.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $85 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌28.3% HIGHER MSRP$385 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen Embedded V2546?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 244 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 241 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 127 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 273 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Embedded V2546

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen Embedded V2546
Ryzen Embedded V2546
The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Embedded V2546's 10,912 — a 27.5% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+24% | 3.95 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Renoir (2020−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397+32% | 10,912 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2546). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($385 vs $300), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 — making the Core i7-9700K the 2.8% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Embedded V2546 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385 | $300-22% |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+3% | 36.4 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











