Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Embedded V2546

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2546

6 Cores12 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.95 GHz2020

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +41.5% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Embedded V2546 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • 28.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $385 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
  • 111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Ryzen Embedded V2546

2020

Why buy it

  • Costs $85 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (10,912 vs 14,397).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen Embedded V2546?
Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 41.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data and 31.9% better PassMark, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 41.5% more average FPS across 5 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the better fit. You are getting 31.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the smarter buy today. Core i7-9700K is 28.3% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it gives you a 41.5% average FPS lead across 5 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.8% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 36.4 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Embedded V2546 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
1080p
low308 FPS182 FPS
medium278 FPS147 FPS
high231 FPS120 FPS
ultra182 FPS93 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS152 FPS
medium221 FPS122 FPS
high178 FPS98 FPS
ultra143 FPS75 FPS
4K
low170 FPS69 FPS
medium140 FPS59 FPS
high108 FPS46 FPS
ultra95 FPS36 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
1080p
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium321 FPS244 FPS
high291 FPS213 FPS
ultra259 FPS168 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS241 FPS
medium282 FPS213 FPS
high258 FPS190 FPS
ultra225 FPS154 FPS
4K
low249 FPS206 FPS
medium221 FPS189 FPS
high208 FPS164 FPS
ultra179 FPS127 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
1080p
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra360 FPS273 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra360 FPS273 FPS
4K
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra318 FPS221 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
1080p
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra360 FPS273 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra360 FPS273 FPS
4K
low360 FPS273 FPS
medium360 FPS273 FPS
high360 FPS273 FPS
ultra360 FPS273 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Embedded V2546

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded V2546

The Ryzen Embedded V2546 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 November 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (2020−2023) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.95 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 10,912 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.95 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V2546 — a 21.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses Renoir (2020−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Embedded V2546's 10,912 — a 27.5% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V2546.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+24%
3.95 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)+50%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
7 nm-50%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Renoir (2020−2023)
PassMark
14,397+32%
10,912
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
Socket
LGA1151
FP6
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Ryzen Embedded V2546). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V2546 debuted at $300. On MSRP ($385 vs $300), the Ryzen Embedded V2546 is $85 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V2546 — making the Core i7-9700K the 2.8% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Embedded V2546
MSRP
$385
$300-22%
Performance per Dollar
37.4+3%
36.4
Release Date
2018
2020