Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

32 Cores64 Thrd250 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2018

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Costs $1,414 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • Delivers 110.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 17.8 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $1,799 MSRP).
  • Draws 95W instead of 250W, a 155W reduction.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 31,945).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +14.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
  • 300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.8 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($1,799 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
  • 163.2% higher power demand at 250W vs 95W.
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX better than Core i7-9700K?
Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.2% more average FPS across 2 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is the better fit. You are getting 121.9% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 367.3% more expensive on MSRP at $1,799 MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.2% average FPS lead across 2 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 110.6% better value on paper (37.4 vs 17.8 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
1080p
low308 FPS198 FPS
medium278 FPS177 FPS
high231 FPS143 FPS
ultra182 FPS115 FPS
1440p
low270 FPS160 FPS
medium221 FPS134 FPS
high178 FPS104 FPS
ultra143 FPS85 FPS
4K
low170 FPS73 FPS
medium140 FPS64 FPS
high108 FPS50 FPS
ultra95 FPS41 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
1080p
low360 FPS536 FPS
medium321 FPS483 FPS
high291 FPS404 FPS
ultra259 FPS354 FPS
1440p
low324 FPS473 FPS
medium282 FPS424 FPS
high258 FPS360 FPS
ultra225 FPS299 FPS
4K
low249 FPS295 FPS
medium221 FPS265 FPS
high208 FPS242 FPS
ultra179 FPS213 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
1080p
low360 FPS768 FPS
medium360 FPS640 FPS
high360 FPS577 FPS
ultra360 FPS504 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS640 FPS
medium360 FPS533 FPS
high360 FPS465 FPS
ultra360 FPS408 FPS
4K
low360 FPS469 FPS
medium360 FPS377 FPS
high360 FPS336 FPS
ultra318 FPS280 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
1080p
low360 FPS799 FPS
medium360 FPS799 FPS
high360 FPS704 FPS
ultra360 FPS616 FPS
1440p
low360 FPS728 FPS
medium360 FPS644 FPS
high360 FPS549 FPS
ultra360 FPS474 FPS
4K
low360 FPS522 FPS
medium360 FPS473 FPS
high360 FPS419 FPS
ultra360 FPS362 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

AMD

Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX

The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 August 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 250 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 31,945 points. Launch price was $1,799.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — a 15.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX's 31,945 — a 75.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
Cores / Threads
8 / 8
32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+17%
4.2 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
64 MB+433%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
14,397
31,945+122%
Cinebench R23 Multi
33,213
Geekbench 6 Single
1,206
Geekbench 6 Multi
7,612
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2666 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 64 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and X399 (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX).

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
Socket
LGA1151
TR4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels
2
4+100%
ECC Support
No
No
PCIe Lanes
16
64+300%
🔧

Advanced Features

Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX targets Extreme Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX rivals Core i9-9980XE.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V
Target Use
Desktop
Extreme Content Creation
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX debuted at $1799. On MSRP ($385 vs $1799), the Core i7-9700K is $1414 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 17.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX — making the Core i7-9700K the 71.2% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-9700KRyzen Threadripper 2990WX
MSRP
$385-79%
$1799
Performance per Dollar
37.4+110%
17.8
Release Date
2018
2018