
Core i7-9700K

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,014 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $1,399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 49,756).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +19.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+433.3% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌263.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,399 MSRPvs$385 MSRP
- ❌268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 49,756 points. Launch price was $1,399.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX's 49,756 — a 110.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 64 MB (total)+433% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+25500% | 1 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 49,756+246% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus 5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports 95% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | 5200+95% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX rivals Xeon w5-3435X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX came in at $1399. On launch pricing ($385 vs $1399), Core i7-9700K was $1014 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 35.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX — making the Core i7-9700K the 5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-72% | $1399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+5% | 35.6 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













