
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,264 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 82,268).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +73.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,264 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 20.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $2,649 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +73.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 82,268).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($2,649 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 816 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 695 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 469 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 668 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 593 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 386 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 373 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 336 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 269 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 82,268 points. Launch price was $2,649.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — a 7.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX's 82,268 — a 140.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.3 GHz+8% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 128 MB (total)+967% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 5 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 82,268+471% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 38,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,686 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 23,294 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features
Both processors feature an unlocked multiplier for overclocking. Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX debuted at $2649. On MSRP ($385 vs $2649), the Core i7-9700K is $2264 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX — making the Core i7-9700K the 18.5% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-85% | $2649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+20% | 31.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











