
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11,314 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 176,281).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $11,314 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 148.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $11,699 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 350W, a 255W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 96 cores / 192 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅700% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 176,281).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX, which brings 96 cores / 192 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($11,699 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌268.4% higher power demand at 350W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 300 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 194 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 785 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 675 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 531 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 655 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 584 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 377 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 331 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 263 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 887 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 726 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 653 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 555 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 418 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 488 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 302 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 1115 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 877 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 789 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 878 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 773 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 677 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 589 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 641 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 571 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 506 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 96 cores and 192 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 384 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 176,281 points. Launch price was $11,700.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 96 cores / 192 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX has 88 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — a 9.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX's 176,281 — a 169.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 384 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 96 / 192+1100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.4 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 384 MB (total)+3100% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 4 nm-71% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 176,281+1124% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 180,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 30,170 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX offers 112 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 128+700% |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX targets High-end Workstation / AI Rendering. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX rivals Xeon w9-3495X.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | true |
| Target Use | Desktop | High-end Workstation / AI Rendering |
Value Analysis
The Core i7-9700K launched at $385 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX debuted at $11699. On MSRP ($385 vs $11699), the Core i7-9700K is $11314 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 15.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX — making the Core i7-9700K the 85.1% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-97% | $11699 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+148% | 15.1 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











