
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Ryzen Z2 Go
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Core i7-9700K
2018Ryzen Z2 Go
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +31.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 95W, a 93W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Ryzen Z2 Go mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌4650% higher power demand at 95W vs 2W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,188 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Ryzen Z2 Go?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 241 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 184 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 249 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 194 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 163 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 195 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 143 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 119 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 220 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Ryzen Z2 Go

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.


Ryzen Z2 Go
Ryzen Z2 Go
The Ryzen Z2 Go is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Rembrandt R (2025) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 6 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB + 8 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 12,188 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen Z2 Go offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Z2 Go — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen Z2 Go uses Rembrandt R (2025) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Ryzen Z2 Go's 12,188 — a 16.6% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB on the Ryzen Z2 Go.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 2 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 6 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Rembrandt R (2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397+18% | 12,188 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 5,802 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,842 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,073 |
Memory & Platform
Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Z2 Go — the Ryzen Z2 Go supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-9700K supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and Rembrandt-R (Ryzen Z2 Go).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | — |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | LPDDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) vs SVM (Ryzen Z2 Go). Both include integrated graphics — UHD Graphics 630 (Core i7-9700K) and Radeon 680M (Ryzen Z2 Go) — useful as a fallback for troubleshooting or display output without a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Ryzen Z2 Go targets Budget. Direct competitor: Ryzen Z2 Go rivals Core Ultra 5 135U.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Ryzen Z2 Go |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | Yes |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | Radeon 680M |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | SVM |
| Target Use | Desktop | Budget |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











