Core i7-9700K vs V-Series V105

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
VS
AMD

V-Series V105

1 Cores1 Thrd512 WWMax: 1.2 GHz2010

Core i7-9700K vs V-Series V105 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs V-Series V105 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs V-Series V105: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • βœ…Better for gaming: +779.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • βœ…Draws 95W instead of 512W, a 417W reduction.
  • βœ…100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • βœ…Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while V-Series V105 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while V-Series V105 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

V-Series V105

2010

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
    • ❌Lower PassMark (1,028 vs 14,397).
    • ❌438.9% higher power demand at 512W vs 95W.
    • ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Core i7-9700K better than V-Series V105?
    Yes. Core i7-9700K is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 779.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 1300.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 779.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1300.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 779.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 1/1. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

    Core i7-9700K vs V-Series V105 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    Intel

    Core i7-9700K

    The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

    AMD

    V-Series V105

    The V-Series V105 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 May 2010 (15 years ago). It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Max frequency: 1.2 GHz. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 512 kB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,028 points. Launch price was $69.

    ⚑

    Processing Power

    The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the V-Series V105 offers 1 cores / 1 threads β€” the Core i7-9700K has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 1.2 GHz on the V-Series V105 β€” a 121.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K. The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the V-Series V105's 1,028 β€” a 173.3% lead for the Core i7-9700K.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KV-Series V105
    Cores / Threads
    8 / 8+700%
    1 / 1
    Boost Clock
    4.9 GHz+308%
    1.2 GHz
    Base Clock
    3.6 GHz
    β€”
    L3 Cache
    12 MB (total)
    β€”
    L2 Cache
    256K (per core)
    512 kB+100%
    Process
    14 nm-69%
    45 nm
    Architecture
    Coffee Lake-R (2018βˆ’2019)
    β€”
    PassMark
    14,397+1300%
    1,028
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the V-Series V105 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) β€” making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KV-Series V105
    Socket
    LGA1151
    S1
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 3.0+50%
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR4-2666
    β€”
    Max RAM Capacity
    128 GB
    β€”
    RAM Channels
    2
    β€”
    ECC Support
    No
    β€”
    PCIe Lanes
    16
    β€”
    πŸ”§

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (V-Series V105). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the V-Series V105 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

    FeatureCore i7-9700KV-Series V105
    Integrated GPU
    Yes
    β€”
    IGPU Model
    UHD Graphics 630
    β€”
    Unlocked
    Yes
    β€”
    AVX-512
    No
    β€”
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    β€”
    Target Use
    Desktop
    β€”