Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 5110

Intel

Core i7-9700K

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.9 GHz2018
Similar parts
·······
VS
Intel

Xeon 5110

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2006
Similar parts
·······

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 5110 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 5110 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 5110: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +795.1% higher average FPS across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
  • Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon 5110 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon 5110 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Xeon 5110

2006

Why buy it

  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 44 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (1,055 vs 14,397).
  • No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon 5110?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon 5110 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 795.1% more average FPS across 44 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1264.6% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in at an unclear MSRP at $385 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 795.1% average FPS lead across 44 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2006) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 2/2. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 5110 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Intel

Xeon 5110

The Xeon 5110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Junho 2006 (19 years ago). It is based on the Woodcrest (2006) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,055 points. Launch price was $20.

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon 5110 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon 5110 — a 101.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 5110 uses Woodcrest (2006) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon 5110's 1,055 — a 172.7% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 0 kB on the Xeon 5110.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon 5110
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+300%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
4.9 GHz+206%
1.6 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+125%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
12 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)+6300%
4 MB
Process
14 nm-78%
65 nm
Architecture
Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)
Woodcrest (2006)
PassMark
14,397+1265%
1,055
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 5110 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon 5110
Socket
LGA1151
LGA771
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
No
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon 5110). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon 5110 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.

FeatureCore i7-9700KXeon 5110
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
Yes
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Desktop