
Core i7-9700K

Xeon 6724P
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 6724P Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 6724P FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 6724P: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,237 less on MSRP ($385 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 255.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 210W, a 115W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon 6724P needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 38,061).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 72 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA1151 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.
Xeon 6724P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+500% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1151 and DDR4.
- ✅450% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
- ❌121.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon 6724P better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i7-9700K vs Xeon 6724P Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon 6724P
The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6724P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 13% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 90.2% lead for the Xeon 6724P. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+14% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 72 MB (total)+500% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core)+12700% | 2 MB (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | Intel 3 nm-79% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 38,061+164% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,800 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 25,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Xeon 6724P supports 140.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i7-9700K) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-9700K) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA4710 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-6400+140% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 88+450% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon 6724P supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon 6724P requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | None |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | Desktop | Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Xeon 6724P came in at $3622. On launch pricing ($385 vs $3622), Core i7-9700K was $3237 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the Core i7-9700K the 112.3% better value option.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon 6724P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $385-89% | $3622 |
| Performance per Dollar | 37.4+256% | 10.5 |
| Release Date | 2018 | 2025 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














