PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon D-1718T FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon D-1718T: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +67.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Delivers 16.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 37.4 vs 32.0 PassMark/$ ($385 MSRP vs $302 MSRP).
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1718T needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌
27.5% HIGHER MSRP
$385 MSRPvs$302 MSRP
❌106.5% higher power demand at 95W vs 46W.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon D-1718T

2022

Why buy it

✅Costs $83 less on MSRP ($302 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
✅Draws 46W instead of 95W, a 49W reduction.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,674 vs 14,397).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 12 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 32.0 vs 37.4 PassMark/$ ($302 MSRP vs $385 MSRP).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon D-1718T?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon D-1718T makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i7-9700K is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 67.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-9700K is the stronger fit. You are getting 48.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 20% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-9700K is the better buy right now. Core i7-9700K comes in 27.5% more expensive on MSRP at $385 MSRP versus $302 MSRP, and it still gives you a 67.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 16.7% better value on MSRP (37.4 vs 32.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1718T makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018) and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-9700K vs Xeon D-1718T Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon D-1718T

The Xeon D-1718T is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 46 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,674 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-1718T offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1718T — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon D-1718T's 9,674 — a 39.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 10 MB on the Xeon D-1718T.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1718T
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+40%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+38%	2.6 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)+20%	10 MB
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	—
PassMark	14,397+49%	9,674
Geekbench 6 Single	—	900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	3,500

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1718T uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i7-9700K versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-1718T — the Xeon D-1718T supports 10% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-1718T supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 16 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel 300 series (Core i7-9700K) and SoC (Xeon D-1718T).

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1718T
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	DDR4-2933+10%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	256 GB+100%
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	16	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i7-9700K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Xeon D-1718T supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Both support VT-x, VT-d virtualization. The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1718T requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop, Xeon D-1718T targets Server/Edge.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1718T
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 630	None
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	Desktop	Server/Edge

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-9700K was priced at $385, while the Xeon D-1718T came in at $302. On launch pricing ($385 vs $302), Xeon D-1718T was $83 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-9700K delivers 37.4 pts/$ vs 32.0 pts/$ for the Xeon D-1718T — making the Core i7-9700K the 15.4% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1718T
MSRP	$385	$302-22%
Performance per Dollar	37.4+17%	32.0
Release Date	2018	2022

Search Core i7-9700K on Amazon

Search Xeon D-1718T on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.