PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1736NT needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1736NT across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 17,826).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 67W instead of 95W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Xeon D-1736NT

2022

Why buy it

✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-1736NT needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
✅Draws 67W instead of 95W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon D-1736NT across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 17,826).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-1736NT, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-1736NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-1736NT better than Core i7-9700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-1736NT makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon D-1736NT is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 9.5% more average FPS across 3 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-1736NT is the better fit. You are getting 23.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-1736NT is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon D-1736NT is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you a 9.5% average FPS lead across 3 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-1736NT is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Xeon D-1736NT Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
1080p
low	308 FPS	179 FPS
medium	278 FPS	147 FPS
high	231 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	96 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	145 FPS
medium	221 FPS	116 FPS
high	178 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	68 FPS
medium	140 FPS	58 FPS
high	108 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-1736NT

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
1080p
low	360 FPS	283 FPS
medium	321 FPS	243 FPS
high	291 FPS	212 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	168 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	249 FPS
medium	282 FPS	220 FPS
high	258 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	153 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	179 FPS
medium	221 FPS	164 FPS
high	208 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	109 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-1736NT

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
1080p
low	360 FPS	446 FPS
medium	360 FPS	446 FPS
high	360 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	446 FPS
medium	360 FPS	446 FPS
high	360 FPS	425 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	370 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	424 FPS
medium	360 FPS	330 FPS
high	360 FPS	294 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	236 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-1736NT

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
1080p
low	360 FPS	446 FPS
medium	360 FPS	446 FPS
high	360 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	446 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	446 FPS
medium	360 FPS	446 FPS
high	360 FPS	446 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	443 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	446 FPS
medium	360 FPS	417 FPS
high	360 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	326 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-1736NT

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon D-1736NT

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon D-1736NT

The Xeon D-1736NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2227. Thermal design power (TDP): 67 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 17,826 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, matching the Xeon D-1736NT's 8 cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon D-1736NT — a 33.3% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon D-1736NT's 17,826 — a 21.3% lead for the Xeon D-1736NT. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 15 MB on the Xeon D-1736NT.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+40%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+33%	2.7 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	15 MB+25%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	—
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	—
PassMark	14,397	17,826+24%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-1736NT uses FCBGA2227 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-1736NT
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA2227
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon D-1736NT). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-1736NT requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.