
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2752TER
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-2752TER needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,074).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2752TER, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-2752TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.
Xeon D-2752TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅+32.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon D-2752TER
2022Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-2752TER needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+32.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ✅Draws 77W instead of 95W, a 18W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,074).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2752TER, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-2752TER mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌23.4% higher power demand at 95W vs 77W.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon D-2752TER better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 205 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 182 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 161 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 74 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 441 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 362 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 333 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 229 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 477 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 400 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 305 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon D-2752TER

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon D-2752TER
Xeon D-2752TER
The Xeon D-2752TER is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 77 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 19,074 points. Launch price was $1,061.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-2752TER offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon D-2752TER has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon D-2752TER — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon D-2752TER's 19,074 — a 27.9% lead for the Xeon D-2752TER. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2752TER.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+75% | 2.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+100% | 1.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 19,074+32% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2752TER uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon D-2752TER). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-2752TER requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon D-2752TER |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












