PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-2775TE needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 27,299).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+89.6% higher PassMark.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Core i7-9700K

2018

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +27.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon D-2775TE needs a discrete GPU.

Why buy it

✅+89.6% higher PassMark.
✅+108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 27,299).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon D-2775TE better than Core i7-9700K?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-9700K is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE is the better fit. You are getting 89.6% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon D-2775TE is the smarter buy by a wide margin for a fresh build. Xeon D-2775TE is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $385 MSRP, and it gives you 89.6% better PassMark. Core i7-9700K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that is mostly used-market pricing on an obsolete 2018 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (37.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a very cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA1151.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2775TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2018), 108.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Core i7-9700K Benchmark Check

Xeon D-2775TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	308 FPS	177 FPS
medium	278 FPS	146 FPS
high	231 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	270 FPS	144 FPS
medium	221 FPS	115 FPS
high	178 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	170 FPS	68 FPS
medium	140 FPS	58 FPS
high	108 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	36 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-2775TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	360 FPS	205 FPS
medium	321 FPS	182 FPS
high	291 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	259 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	324 FPS	176 FPS
medium	282 FPS	161 FPS
high	258 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	225 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	249 FPS	114 FPS
medium	221 FPS	106 FPS
high	208 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	179 FPS	75 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-2775TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	360 FPS	682 FPS
medium	360 FPS	581 FPS
high	360 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	587 FPS
medium	360 FPS	478 FPS
high	360 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	362 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	429 FPS
medium	360 FPS	333 FPS
high	360 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	318 FPS	229 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-2775TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	360 FPS	682 FPS
medium	360 FPS	682 FPS
high	360 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	548 FPS
1440p
low	360 FPS	659 FPS
medium	360 FPS	573 FPS
high	360 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	360 FPS	450 FPS
medium	360 FPS	403 FPS
high	360 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	360 FPS	309 FPS

Open Core i7-9700K Open Xeon D-2775TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon D-2775TE

Core i7-9700K

The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 45% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 61.9% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 8	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz+58%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	25 MB (total)+108%
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+400%
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	14,397	27,299+90%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-9700K	Xeon D-2775TE
Socket	LGA1151	FCBGA2579
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2666	—
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon D-2775TE). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon D-2775TE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.