
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E-2386G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E-2386G needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,468).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2386G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon E-2386G
2021Why buy it
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E-2386G needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 19,468).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2386G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E-2386G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E-2386G better than Core i7-9700K?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 192 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 167 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 348 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 380 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 248 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 450 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 320 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 487 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E-2386G

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon E-2386G
Xeon E-2386G
The Xeon E-2386G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 19,468 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E-2386G offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2386G — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2386G (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E-2386G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E-2386G's 19,468 — a 29.9% lead for the Xeon E-2386G. Both processors carry 12 MB (total) of L3 cache.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz | 5.1 GHz+4% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512K (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Rocket Lake-E (2021) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 19,468+35% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2386G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E-2386G). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E-2386G requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E-2386G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












