
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌30.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 73W.
Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 95W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon E3-1245 v6
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +66.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 73W instead of 95W, a 22W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E3-1245 v6 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌30.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 73W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (8,711 vs 14,397).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon E3-1245 v6?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 170 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 131 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 74 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 151 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 111 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 218 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 218 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E3-1245 v6

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon E3-1245 v6
Xeon E3-1245 v6
The Xeon E3-1245 v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 28 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 73 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 8,711 points. Launch price was $284.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Core i7-9700K has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon E3-1245 v6 — a 17.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E3-1245 v6's 8,711 — a 49.2% lead for the Core i7-9700K. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1245 v6.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+20% | 4.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.7 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total)+50% | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB+300% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Kaby Lake (2016−2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397+65% | 8,711 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA1151 socket with PCIe 3.0.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E3-1245 v6). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1245 v6 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E3-1245 v6 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












