
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,835).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅+30.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon E5-2695 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 120W, a 25W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+30.8% higher PassMark.
- ✅+275% larger total L3 cache (45 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 18 cores / 36 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 18,835).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 45 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2695 v4, which brings 18 cores / 36 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2695 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌26.3% higher power demand at 120W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon E5-2695 v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 447 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 467 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 356 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E5-2695 v4

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon E5-2695 v4
Xeon E5-2695 v4
The Xeon E5-2695 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 18 cores and 36 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 45 MB. L2 cache: 4.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 18,835 points. Launch price was $2,424.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 offers 18 cores / 36 threads — the Xeon E5-2695 v4 has 10 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2695 v4 — a 39% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-9700K uses the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E5-2695 v4's 18,835 — a 26.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2695 v4. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 45 MB on the Xeon E5-2695 v4.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 18 / 36+125% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+48% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+71% | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 45 MB+275% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 4.5 MB+1700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 18,835+31% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E5-2695 v4). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2695 v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E5-2695 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












