
Core i7-9700K
Popular choices:

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Core i7-9700K
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,966).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 38 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅+80.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i7-9700K
2018Xeon E7-8880 v2
2014Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.6% higher average FPS across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 95W instead of 130W, a 35W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics 630, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 needs a discrete GPU.
Why buy it
- ✅+80.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+212.5% larger total L3 cache (38 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 15 cores / 30 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,397 vs 25,966).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 38 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E7-8880 v2, which brings 15 cores / 30 threads.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $385 MSRP, while Xeon E7-8880 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i7-9700K across 47 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌36.8% higher power demand at 130W vs 95W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-9700K can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i7-9700K better than Xeon E7-8880 v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 182 FPS |
| medium | 278 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 231 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 270 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 178 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 170 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 108 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 368 FPS |
| medium | 321 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 291 FPS | 269 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 282 FPS | 282 FPS |
| high | 258 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 225 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 249 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 221 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 208 FPS | 151 FPS |
| ultra | 179 FPS | 121 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 631 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 597 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 531 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 372 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 632 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 521 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 360 FPS | 634 FPS |
| medium | 360 FPS | 552 FPS |
| high | 360 FPS | 476 FPS |
| ultra | 360 FPS | 397 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-9700K and Xeon E7-8880 v2

Core i7-9700K
Core i7-9700K
The Core i7-9700K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 14,397 points. Launch price was $374.

Xeon E7-8880 v2
Xeon E7-8880 v2
The Xeon E7-8880 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 15 cores and 30 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 37.5 MB. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 25,966 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Core i7-9700K packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 offers 15 cores / 30 threads — the Xeon E7-8880 v2 has 7 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Core i7-9700K versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E7-8880 v2 — a 45% clock advantage for the Core i7-9700K (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The Core i7-9700K is built on the Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Core i7-9700K scores 14,397 against the Xeon E7-8880 v2's 25,966 — a 57.3% lead for the Xeon E7-8880 v2. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-9700K vs 37.5 MB on the Xeon E7-8880 v2.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8 | 15 / 30+88% |
| Boost Clock | 4.9 GHz+58% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+44% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 37.5 MB+213% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | — |
| Process | 14 nm-36% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Coffee Lake-R (2018−2019) | — |
| PassMark | 14,397 | 25,966+80% |
Memory & Platform
The Core i7-9700K uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1151 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d (Core i7-9700K) / not specified (Xeon E7-8880 v2). The Core i7-9700K includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E7-8880 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-9700K targets Desktop.
| Feature | Core i7-9700K | Xeon E7-8880 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 630 | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | — |
| Target Use | Desktop | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












